Dissolving Hierarchy; Fragmenting Knowledge: Why People Misunderstand Realism
A major structural flaw (containment🐍strategy) in modern education is the failure to teach epistemic hierarchy and foundationalism. Students are not taught that metaphysics serves as the foundation for epistemology, which in turn shapes ethics, law, and governance. Without this structured understanding, knowledge appears as a collection of disjointed disciplines (Fragmentum🪄), rather than an interconnected framework that must be built upon fundamental truths. This fragmentation leads students to believe that law and politics can be studied without reference to philosophy or metaphysics, reinforcing the assumption that governance is purely a matter of social agreement rather than an extension of objective moral order.
This disconnection between disciplines has profound consequences. It leads to a society where law is no longer seen as an expression of justice but as an evolving system that must be continually reinterpreted based on changing societal norms. It fosters the belief that rights are granted by government rather than inherent in human nature. It allows people to accept legal positivism as a neutral or pragmatic approach to law, without realizing that it is built upon the very philosophical errors that undermine their own sovereignty. Because students are not taught to recognize the deeper structures of knowledge, they fail to see how their rejection of realism enables the gradual erosion of their rights and freedoms. The absence of metaphysical realism in education has also produced an intellectual environment in which skepticism and relativism are treated as sophisticated positions, while belief in objective reality is dismissed as naïve or outdated. Students are trained to deconstruct knowledge rather than to build it, making them predisposed to reject any claim that truth exists independently of perception. This skepticism, when applied to law and governance, leads directly to the belief that sovereignty and rights are not fixed but negotiable, making them vulnerable to state manipulation.
Another major failure of modern education is its exclusive emphasis on the Theory Of Ideas philosophical lineage; particularly the dominance of Cartesian rationalism and British empiricism. Many students are introduced to philosophy through Descartes and Locke, bypassing centuries of earlier thought. This creates a false dichotomy where students are led to believe that knowledge is either a product of pure rational deduction, as Descartes suggested, or something derived entirely from sensory experience, as Locke and Hume argued. Both positions distort the true nature of realism by severing reason from experience and forcing students to choose between two inadequate models of understanding reality. This omission of the Aristotelian tradition prevents students from recognizing the crucial metaphysical underpinnings of realism as a synthesis of empirical observation and rational intelligibility, reinforcing the mistaken notion that metaphysical realism is either speculative mysticism or an unnecessary abstraction.
The dominance of nominalism in modern logic and language theory has further eroded students’ ability to understand realism. Contemporary education teaches that words and concepts are mere social conventions, devoid of intrinsic connection to reality. This leads students to believe that terms like “justice,” “law,” and “truth” are arbitrary constructs rather than reflections of an objective order. When language is detached from reality in this way, students are conditioned to accept legal and moral relativism as natural and inevitable. They no longer view law as something grounded in permanent truths but as a flexible system that can be shaped according to societal preferences. This nominalist conditioning prevents individuals from grasping the realist principle that law is something to be discovered rather than invented, leading them to unknowingly embrace the epistemic framework that underpins legal positivism and state-controlled governance.
Modern education has not only failed to provide students with a coherent foundation for understanding reality but has actively conditioned them to reject the very principles necessary for self-governance. By omitting metaphysical & philosophical realism, promoting nominalism in language & law and encouraging skepticism as the default intellectual stance, it has (by design) engineered a population that is intellectually defenceless against legal and political manipulation. People are not rejecting realism because they have carefully considered its arguments and found them lacking; they are rejecting it because they have never been properly introduced to it in the first place. The only way to correct these errors is to reintegrate realist metaphysics into education and restore the proper epistemological foundations that connect law, philosophy, and governance. Without this restoration, people will continue to make the same fundamental mistakes, allowing those in power to redefine reality at will and erode the very principles that make popular sovereignty and self-governance possible.
The modern educational system has systematically failed to provide students with the necessary metaphysical and epistemological distinctions required to correctly understand realism. Instead of equipping individuals with a clear and structured view of reality, education has embedded within them a framework that predisposes them to reject realism in favor of nominalism, constructivism, and skepticism. This failure is not an accident but the result of a long-standing philosophical drift that has replaced foundational metaphysical training with an increasingly fragmented and incoherent understanding of knowledge.
One of the primary reasons people misunderstand realism is the absence of proper training in Aristotelian metaphysics and the broader scholastic tradition. For centuries, Aristotle’s philosophy provided the essential framework for understanding reality as something independent of perception, rooted in objective categories of being and causality. His work established a coherent structure in which physical and metaphysical realities were unified, allowing knowledge to be both empirical and rationally intelligible. However, modern education has abandoned this foundation, leaving students with an incomplete or distorted understanding of realism. Rather than presenting Aristotelian realism as the most enduring and coherent framework for understanding, it is either ignored, misrepresented as predominantly ‘empiricist’ (through Neoplatonic synthesis), rejected out of hand as a theological tool, or dismissed as outdated pre modern speculation.
This misrepresentation leads many students to assume that metaphysics is detached from empirical reality, treating it as mere abstract speculation rather than recognizing it as the necessary framework that makes empirical reality intelligible in the first place. Without this foundation, individuals are left with a fragmented view of knowledge, where science, ethics, and law are taught as separate and unrelated fields, rather than as disciplines that must be grounded in a unified philosophical understanding of reality. As a result, many mistakenly believe that realism requires adherence to an abstract system detached from observable experience, rather than seeing it as the essential grounding that allows perception and knowledge to function coherently.
Modern philosophy education presents students with a distorted historical narrative that begins with Descartes and quickly shifts to British Empiricism, entirely skipping over the robust realist tradition that predated the Enlightenment. As a result, students are conditioned to think about knowledge and reality in terms of a false dichotomy: either truth is derived from pure reason, as in Rationalist Idealism, or it is constructed entirely through sensory experience, as in Empirical Nominalism. What they are not taught is Realism; that integrates sense experience with objective reality rather than reducing knowledge to either abstract deduction or subjective perception. This educational oversight has profound consequences. When students are taught that philosophical thought began with Descartes, they are immediately introduced to methodological skepticism; the idea that knowledge must be doubted until proven through rational certainty. Descartes famously begins his philosophy by questioning everything, asserting that only through pure reasoning can one establish an indubitable foundation for knowledge. This approach, while innovative in its time, severed reason from reality, prioritizing mental abstraction over direct engagement with the world. Students who absorb this framework are conditioned to assume that truth is something to be generated by thought rather than something to be recognized in the external world. This was precisely the bind I found myself in but could not articulate without forensic diagnostics.
Following Descartes, students are then introduced to British Empiricism, which presents an entirely opposite but equally flawed epistemological stance. Empiricists such as Locke and Hume argue that all knowledge is derived from sensory experience, rejecting the notion that reason can access objective truths beyond what is immediately observable. This shift reinforces the idea that knowledge is contingent upon human perception rather than reflective of an independent reality. By the time students are exposed to these two traditions, they have been trained to think in terms of an either-or framework: knowledge must come from either pure reason (as in Rationalism) or from pure sensory observation (as in Empiricism). What they are not given is the Philosophical & Epistemological framework maintaining that knowledge is gained through both reason and sensory experience, working together to grasp objective reality.
This miseducation leads students to make a crucial and damaging mistake. Because Rationalist Idealism and Empirical Constructivism both have obvious flaws, students wrongly conclude that realism must be one of these two positions, and since both are inadequate, they discard realism altogether. Rationalism’s flaw is that it detaches knowledge from experience, leading to abstract theories that often fail to correspond with reality (but have immense utility for 🐍Operational Success🪄). Empiricism’s flaw is that it reduces knowledge to mere perception, leading to skepticism about objective truth (a boon to Ideological☠️Subversion & Behavioural☠️Management campaigns). Given these limitations, students who have never been exposed to the realist tradition are left with no viable alternative, pushing them toward 🐍relativism, 🐍constructivism, or even outright 🐍skepticism.
This misrepresentation of philosophy’s historical development has shaped modern intellectual culture, creating a world in which realism is rarely even considered, let alone properly🔥defended. Those who reject Rationalist abstraction often fall into the trap of Empirical constructivism, believing that reality is nothing more than what can be directly observed and measured. Those who reject Empiricism’s limitations often fall back into a Rationalist idealism, assuming that truth must be established purely through logical deduction rather than through an engagement with the real world. Because they are not introduced to realism as the functioning framework of reason and observation functioning together, they assume that all knowledge is either abstract or subjective, leading them to reject the possibility of objective truth altogether.
The consequences of this educational failure extend beyond philosophy classrooms. Legal theory, governance, and even scientific inquiry are shaped by this same false dichotomy. The rise of legal positivism, for example, is a direct result of Empiricism’s influence; since law is seen as a human construct rather than something grounded in objective moral principles, legal interpretation becomes an exercise in social engineering rather than the discovery of justice. Similarly, the Rationalist tendency to detach truth from reality manifests in the bureaucratic tendency to impose theoretical solutions without regard for practical consequences. These errors are not isolated to academic debates but actively shape how societies are governed and how institutions define truth, law, and rights. The only way to correct this widespread misunderstanding is to restore the missing realist tradition to education, thereby restoring immunity to ideological subversion and epistemic warfare more broadly.
Students must be taught that realism is not a speculative abstraction but a practical and necessary foundation for all knowledge. They must be introduced to the Philosophical & Epistemological framework that integrates sense experience with rational inquiry, allowing them to see knowledge as something discovered in the real world rather than constructed by perception or abstraction. Only by restoring this perspective can we escape the false dichotomy that has led so many into epistemological confusion and intellectual paralysis - fully prey to Totalitarianism in all its guises.
Share this post