Many people today consider themselves educated, informed, and well-equipped to defend liberty. Academics, teachers, intellectuals, and even self-identified Conservatives, Libertarians, and Christians confidently claim to uphold Individual Rights, The Constitution, and Free Speech. Yet, despite their passion for defending these values, many of them unknowingly embrace beliefs that actively dismantle the very foundations of liberty and national sovereignty they claim to protect. This happens because modern education has trained people to reject philosophical and metaphysical realism; the foundation that makes liberty, self-governance and constitutional order possible.
Many believe they are engaging in sophisticated critical thought when they say:
• “I do not believe in realism.”
• “It has been proven outdated.”
• “It is not my personal belief as a trained academic or teacher.”
• “It does not align with my theological or philosophical worldview.”
These statements reveal a fundamental misunderstanding of how liberty and sovereignty actually function in reality. Liberty is not just an abstract ideal; it is a practical system that relies on a fixed foundation of truth, law, and governance. When individuals abandon realism, they are not just rejecting a philosophy. They are removing the very foundation upon which individual rights and national sovereignty rest, leaving the Republic defenceless against manipulation, corruption, and centralization of power.
How Classical Education Was Subverted
Education used to teach that reality exists independently of human perception. Classical education was built upon realism and affirmed that:
Truth is not subjective; it exists outside of personal opinion.
Moral law is fixed and objective; it does not change based on social trends.
Political sovereignty is bound to Natural Law; it is not granted by the state.
But over time, these principles were systematically eroded through epistemic warfare - the deliberate reshaping of education to weaken self-governance. Schools and universities slowly replaced realism with nominalism - the idea that concepts like truth, justice, and rights are merely ‘human inventions’ rather than fixed realities.
This shift happened through several key tactics:
Nominalism displaced realism by teaching that moral and political truths are just social constructs.
Empiricism and materialism reduced education to practical knowledge, sidelining deeper philosophical inquiry.
Hermetic and alchemical transformation tactics deconstructed knowledge, fragmenting it into relativistic, ever-changing paradigms.
Even classical education programs - intended to revive traditional learning - have not been immune to this subversion. Many have unknowingly absorbed nominalist assumptions, failing to defend realism as the non-negotiable foundation of truth, law, and governance.
How Modern “Educated” People Have Been Trained to Accept Their Own Subjugation
Most people today cannot recognize how their own beliefs are being used against them. This is because they have been conditioned to reject realism without understanding what that rejection means in practice. As a result:
They believe truth is a personal or social construct, unaware that this allows those in power to rewrite the law at will.
They think individual rights are granted by the state, not realizing that this means rights can also be revoked by the state.
They assume the U.S. Constitution is a “living document,” failing to see that this leads to legal relativism and the erosion of its original protections.
By embracing nominalist assumptions, they actively help dismantle self-governance and constitutional order.
If truth is subjective, then those in power can change the law whenever it benefits them.
If rights are social constructs, then the state can grant and revoke them at will.
If governance is based on shifting consensus, then democracy becomes a technocracy, where unelected experts dictate reality.
This is how people become passive subjects rather than active citizens. By rejecting realism - even in the name of ‘intellectual sophistication’ (aka hubris) - they unwittingly champion their own subjugation.
The Paradox of “Conservatives” and “Libertarians” Who Uphold Their Own Enslavement
This crisis is not just happening on the political left. Many self-identified Conservatives, Libertarians, and Modern Christians claim to defend:
• The Constitution
• Individual rights
• Free speech
• Self-governance
But they have been trained in the same nominalist, relativist, and voluntarist assumptions that undermine these very principles. They do not realize that:
By rejecting realism, they have no defence against moral relativism, which they claim to oppose.
By rejecting natural law, they have no basis to refute legal positivism, which they claim to resist.
By believing rights are just social constructs, they have no way to protect liberty from being redefined or revoked.
This is why modern political movements fail (strategically👀) to preserve liberty. Their members are philosophically compromised, operating within a framework designed 🚨not to defend the Republic, but to dissolve it.🚨
The only way to reclaim individual liberty, national sovereignty, and the Republic itself is to restore metaphysical and philosophical realism as the foundation of governance and law. This means:
Rebuilding classical education on a non-negotiable realist framework, rejecting nominalist contamination.
Teaching that rights, law, and sovereignty exist independently of the state or personal belief, grounded in Natural Law.
Exposing epistemic warfare and how it has manipulated “educated” individuals into becoming ideological agents of their own enslavement. Only by breaking free from nominalist programming can individuals cease being unconscious participants in their own subjugation and become active defenders of Sovereignty and responsible, principled Liberty.
Share this post